Search
    Google
    Tip of the Day Blog
    The Web

Entries from October 1, 2004 - October 31, 2004

Friday
Oct292004

Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act

TIP OF THE DAY

Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act

From Snopes.com:

On 28 October 2004, the provisions of the Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act (commonly known as "Check 21") will go into effect. The intent of the act is to eliminate check-clearing delays, primarily by removing the requirement that checks must be physically transported to the banks that issued them in order to be cleared for payment. After 28 October 2004, banks will be allowed to transmit and clear checks by electronic facsimile, a practice that should avoid any clearing delays caused by circumstances that make the physical transportation of checks difficult or impossible (e.g., severe weather, power failures, terrorism).

Of course, one result of faster check processing will be a much shorter gap between the time consumers issue checks for payment and the time the covering funds are withdrawn from their accounts (usually referred to as the "float" time). After Check 21 goes into effect checks may be processed in a matter of hours or even minutes, so consumers can no longer safely assume they have a grace period after writing checks before the funds are actually tapped from their accounts. Check 21 does not, however, change the rules affecting how long banks can hold for clearance checks deposited by their customers. Generally, banks can hold local checks for up to two days, out-of-town checks for up to five days, and other types of checks (e.g., checks over $5,000, checks drawn on new accounts, checks written against consistently overdrawn accounts) for up to thirty days. The bottom line is that consumers will have to be more careful than ever to ensure that adequate funds are always available to cover the checks they write.

Also, under Check 21 banks will no longer be required to return canceled checks to their customers; they may return photographic images of the checks instead. Banks will be able to issue certified photocopies of checks known as "substitute checks," and these copies will have the same evidentiary standing in courts of law as the originals. (Although banks may allow customers to view and print out images of their checks over the Internet, those self-printed copies will not technically be considered substitute checks even though most courts will likely still accept them as evidence of payment.) Check 21 will not explicitly require banks to provide substitute checks, so consumers may want to check with their banks to ensure they receive substitute checks with their statements.

Another provision of Check 21 will speed up resolution of customer claims regarding fraud and error. Currently banks do not need to credit the accounts of customers who complain of error or fraud until their investigations are complete. After Check 21 banks must prove within ten days that disputed transactions were not their fault; if they do not provide such proof, they must credit their customers' accounts for the disputed amounts even if they have not completed their investigations.

Although the Check 21 act goes into effect on 28 October 2004, banks do not have to begin electronically clearing checks on that date ­ Check 21 merely authorizes banks to begin use of electronic check clearing. Most major banks already have imaging technology in place, but not all banks do, and some banks may therefore continue to process checks the "old" way until they upgrade their processing systems.
Wednesday
Oct272004

Using Bookmarks In Word

TIP OF THE DAY

Using Bookmarks In Word


You can place bookmarks into a Word document so you can easily and quickly find your place again. For example, if you're reading through a lengthy document and stumble across some piece of information you would like to revisit, you can simply use a bookmark.

To create a bookmark in Word:
  1. Click the place in your document where you want to insert a bookmark.
  2. Click Bookmark from the Insert menu.
  3. Type in a name for the bookmark and click Add.
When you want to locate one of your bookmarks:
  1. Open the Find and Replace dialog box by clicking Find from the Edit menu and selecting the Go To tab or by pressing F5.
  2. Type the name of the bookmark in the Enter page number field.
  3. Click the Go To button.
Source: Lockergnome
Friday
Oct222004

Photo-Printing Services

TIP OF THE DAY

Photo-Printing Services

I'm a big fan of Shutterfly, but here's an article comparing the various services available for online printing of digital pictures.

http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1759,1536878,00.asp

Photo-Printing Services
By Jonathan Roubini

As people switch from film to digital cameras, they often have questions­and legitimate concerns­about getting prints of photos. How do you get high-quality prints? Will they look as good as film photos? Are they expensive?

Fortunately, ordering prints online is much cheaper and easier than you might think. And almost any digital camera­whether 2 megapixels or 5­is capable of producing prints that will look just as good as any you've gotten from your old film camera. That said, there is some variation in quality depending on the services you use. Some printing services print more accurately, while some do a better job of enhancing photos. Some offer better editing tools, and some are just easy to use.

How We Tested

For this story, we tested nine of the top online printing services, according to data provided by InfoTrends. We also tested ez prints, which provides online photo-printing services to many of the sharing services in "Photo-Sharing Services".

To compare printing services, we ordered and compared prints of ten photos from each site. Paul Aresu (
www.paularesu.com), a professional photographer, took three reference photos of model Ania Suarez (www.aniasuarez.com), using a Canon EOS-1Ds. These photos were shot specifically to test the quality and accuracy of the photo-printing services.

The other seven photos were taken by amateur photographers using a variety of 2- to 5-megapixel cameras. These provided a good representation of what to expect for photos from casual photographers and hobbyists.

We rated the output based on perceived quality and on how closely it matched the originals. Quality and accuracy each has its own advantages: If you know you want images reproduced exactly, accuracy will be important. Many casual users, however, will like the enhancing features some services use to make prints look better.

The Results

We were surprised at how drastic some of the differences among these sites were. Our favorite service overall is Shutterfly. It is extremely easy to navigate and offers convenient single-click actions for common tasks, such as rotating images. Ofoto offers equally handy tools and is quite easy to use. The service also produces very good prints. Still, Shutterfly, with its impressive image enhancement feature and a slightly easier-to-use Web site, edges out Ofoto for our Editors' Choice.

Most of ez prints' business comes from partnered Web services that offer photo sharing and other similar tools. For sheer print quality, ez prints is the best. Otherwise, the service is somewhat lacking. For instance, ez prints is devoid of photo-editing tools­no cropping or red-eye reduction, even. The service does provide a general enhancement feature that consistently improved the look of our images.

By contrast, Imagestation offers the most advanced editing tools among these products. But the site is slow, and images are of only average quality.

For the most part, we like Snapfish. The prints look very good, though they can't match the quality of Shutterfly and Ofoto. And the tools aren't as streamlined as with some services; for example, tasks we performed with Shutterfly in just one or two clicks required far more on Snapfish.

The prints Club Photo produced were neither exceptionally fine nor glaringly bad. What did make a strong impression was how badly the Web site is designed. Thumbnails of images are very poor. And when you share an album with a friend, the friend gains access to all your albums; you can't be selective. dotPhoto suffers the same album-sharing flaw. After we wrapped up testing, dotPhoto told us that its site would soon be redesigned.

Kodak Picture Center Online produced relatively poor images. We were particularly surprised when we ordered a print on 16-by-20 paper and received what looked like an ink jet print on Kodak ink jet paper.

The PhotoWorks service is very easy to use. Its print quality, along with Wal-Mart's, was the worst of the services. Wal-Mart also suffers from a lack of features. And unless you purchase storage space (78 cents a year for 10MB), your uploaded pictures will disappear after 30 days.

Interestingly, some of these services use the same photo-processing centers, yet that doesn't necessarily mean the quality is the same. Club Photo and Imagestation use the same lab, and these two services took longer than the others to produce our prints. Meanwhile, dotPhoto and Snapfish both use the same lab, yet Snapfish's prints were the better of the two.


Photo-Printing Services: Shutterfly

Of course, you'll probably want to order prints of your favorite photos. Shutterfly is our favorite all-around printing service. The site is easy to navigate, it includes simple yet effective editing tools, and most important, its print quality is excellent.


Club Photo

Product: Club Photo Club Photo,
www.clubphoto.com

Editor Rating:

The dark profile head shot is kept dark, with slight brightening, yet we see some posterization. In general, Club Photo's prints are decent.


dotPhoto
Product: dotPhoto Company Info: dotPhoto,
www.dotphoto.com

Editor Rating:

In the profile headshot, there is some obvious posterization. The service has also brightened dark images the most. Otherwise, dotPhoto offers good prints.


Snapfish

Product: Snapfish Company Info: Snapfish,
www.snapfish.com

Editor Rating:

The dark pictures we submitted were automatically brightened, and the result is a posterization effect. Apart from this issue, we are pleased with the quality of Snapfish prints.


Shutterfly

Product: Shutterfly Company Info: Shutterfly,
www.shutterfly.com

Editor Rating:

Shutterfly successfully enhanced and brightened the dark pictures without any posterization. The only minor issue is that the sky in one picture has some hints of purple.


ez prints
Product: ez prints Company Info: ez prints,
www.ezprints.com

Editor Rating:

ez prints produces excellent prints. In general, it does a better job in adjusting colors when necessary. The intentionally dark pictures were kept dark­but enhanced to look better.


Wal-Mart

Product: Wal-Mart Company Info: Wal-Mart,
www.walmart.com

Editor Rating:

In this print, the picture is darkened to the point that the hair cannot be distinguished from the background. Wal-Mart has also added some posterization to the test head shot.


Ofoto

Product: Ofoto Company Info: Ofoto,
www.ofoto.com

Editor Rating:

Ofoto produces impressive prints that are very close to the original images. The bright model head shot looks realistic, and the hair keeps its natural brown color.


Kodak Picture Center Online

Product: Kodak Picture Center Online Company Info: Kodak Picture Center Online, picturecenter.kodak.com

Editor Rating:

In this print, the model's hair looks closer to black than to the brown of the original image. Our darker pictures were brightened, producing posterization problems similar to those of Snapfish and dotPhoto.


PhotoWorks

Product: PhotoWorks Company Info: PhotoWorks,
www.photoworks.com

Editor Rating:

Images from PhotoWorks are generally on the red side. There seems to be a sharpening going on in the pictures; this is noticeable in the details of a face.


Imagestation

Product: Imagestation Company Info: Imagestation,
www.imagestation.com

Editor Rating:

The posterization is clear in different areas of this picture. In general, the pictures have a slightly exaggerated tone of black and red.


Photo-Printing Services
Summary_of_Features.pdf
Wednesday
Oct202004

Quickly Saving E-mail Attachments

TIP OF THE DAY

Quickly Saving E-mail Attachments

 

From Lockergnome: Quickly Saving E-mail Attachments

If you are using Outlook or Outlook Express, you can save an attachment by using the Save Attachments command on the File menu. You can also attach a file to an outgoing e-mail by clicking Insert | File Attachment in Outlook Express and Insert | File in Outlook.

Alternately, instead of using the Save Attachments function, you can also click the attachment within the e-mail and drag it onto your desktop or into a specific folder. You can use the same process for attaching files to an outgoing message. Simply click the file you want to attach and drag it into the e-mail. Outlook and Outlook Express will automatically attach the file to your e-mail.

Monday
Oct182004

GoVideo VR2940

TIP OF THE DAY

GoVideo VR2940


From Gizmodo: GoVideo VR2940: VHS to DVD in One Unit

4981c07.jpg





If you've ever tried to take your old VHS home movies and get them on DVD, you probably know what a pain it can be to hook up that ancient, possibly-functioning VCR to a PC-based video capture device. Once you get it capturing correctly, the fun begins: press play and wait. And wait. GoVideo hopes to change all that with their line of dual-deck DVD recorder + VCRs.

The VR2940 model is particularly cool, combining YesDVD (where it splits your VHS into 'scenes' or 'chapters' for easy selection from the DVD's menu screen­just like the pros) with a hi-fi VCR / DVD+RW.  It also sports CleanCopy, which is supposed to clean up and enhance the picture and audio quality of old VHS tapes. The actual effectiveness of this 'enhancement' is unknown.

The unit also sports a FireWire in for your DV Cam, so you can compose and burn DVDs directly from your camera, as well as Progressive Scan out for those of you who can take advantage of such things. It will not, naturally, work with copy-protected VHS tapes such as those featuring Macrovision, but a little birdie (more like a parrot) tells me Macrovision is more of a 'bump in the road' than actual effective DRM.
Read more about this unit here: GoVideo VR2940 [GoVideo]