Search
    Google
    Tip of the Day Blog
    The Web
Wednesday
May112011

National Jukebox

http://www.loc.gov/jukebox/
Library of CongressThe Library of Congress presents the National Jukebox, which makes historical sound recordings available to the public free of charge. The Jukebox includes recordings from the extraordinary collections of the Library of Congress Packard Campus for Audio Visual Conservation and other contributing libraries and archives. Recordings in the Jukebox were issued on record labels now owned by Sony Music Entertainment, which has granted the Library of Congress a gratis license to stream acoustical recordings.

At launch, the Jukebox includes more than 10,000 recordings made by the Victor Talking Machine Company between 1901 and 1925. Jukebox content will be increased regularly, with additional Victor recordings and acoustically recorded titles made by other Sony-owned U.S. labels, including Columbia, OKeh, and others.

 

National Jukebox LOC.gov

Tuesday
May102011

Songkick Tracks Live Music for Users

A Go-to Site for Tracking Music Acts

By BEN SISARIO

Film buffs have the Internet Movie Database. Music video aficionados have YouTube and Vevo. But what’s the go-to Web site for live music?

The touring market is the fastest growing sector of the music industry, yet when it comes to big-tent sites that represent the experience as a whole — and do more than just sell tickets — there are few contenders. One young company called Songkick is trying to change that by feeding its users personalized news about live shows and creating an extensive Web home where fans can share all their concert memories.

Songkick’s main function is simple on an almost Web 1.0 level. After users sign up to track their favorite bands, the service sends free e-mail notifications when those acts are going to be in town, drawing from its database of more than 100,000 concert listings around the world. To fill in any gaps, it can also scan a user’s playlists on iTunes, Pandora or other digital music services, and recommend relevant events.

“We want to make it as easy to go to a concert as it is to go to the movies on a Friday night,” said Ian Hogarth, the company’s chief executive.

Songkick, which was founded in 2007 and is based in London, has also begun to make noise within the concert industry. According to some counts, as many as 40 percent of all concert tickets go unsold. Songkick’s method of user-sanctioned target marketing helps sell more tickets, said Sarah McGoldrick, marketing manager for C3 Presents, an independent concert promoter in Austin, Tex., which supplies listings data to Songkick.

“They have the right idea,” Ms. McGoldrick said. “They’ve gotten people engaged with the Web site, and that means that when they get e-mail they see it as relevant, and not as spam. And the most crucial step in any live entertainment marketing is, if you’re not relevant then you’re wasting your breath.”

With a string of deals to syndicate its data around the Internet, Songkick has also emerged as perhaps the most ambitious listings site. Over the last year, it has begun working with YouTube, Yahoo and the BBC, and it recently signed a deal with the Warner Music Group to manage the Web dissemination of its artists’ tour dates. A mobile app is coming soon, and the company also made a prominent hire: its new chief technology officer is Dan Crow, a veteran of Apple, Google and start-ups like Blurb.

For fans accustomed to the laborious process of scouring for concert listings on blogs, MySpace pages, bands’ Web sites, nightclubs’ sites and e-mail, Songkick’s personalized system can simplify the hunt and turn up news they might have missed.

“It does the heavy lifting for me,” said Joe Zadeh, a 29-year-old tech worker in San Francisco who has been using the service for a year. “If it wasn’t for Songkick, I just wouldn’t go to as many concerts. Because it’s just too much information, too much noise to keep up with.”

Songkick isn’t the only music listings site. Pollstar, the concert industry trade publication, has an extensive online database, and other services like JamBase and Bandsintown allow users to track their favorite bands. But Songkick has emerged as the leader. According to comScore, the site’s monthly traffic has long since surpassed all its competitors’, except for the two gorillas of the market, Ticketmaster and Live Nation. (The two companies, which merged last year, maintain separate Web sites and operate as separate divisions within Live Nation Entertainment.)

Chris LaRosa, music product manager at YouTube, said that integrating concert information had become more important as sites like YouTube become one of music fans’ first stops in discovering new music.

“If you look at a live concert, it’s really a content purchase,” Mr. LaRosa said. “People come to YouTube to preview what concert they want to go to.”

Songkick takes a cut of purchases made via its links, but the company wants to do more than sell concert tickets. Over fried chicken before a concert in Brooklyn one night recently (Handsome Furs, a husband-and-wife duo from Montreal), Mr. Hogarth, a cherubic 29, argued that by focusing on regional markets and doing little to retain customers, the concert industry had left open a huge opportunity: a big, overarching Web site dedicated to the experiences of fans.

Using sites like the Internet Movie Database as a model, Songkick has built an archive of two million concerts going back to the 1950s. Each concert record has an “I was there” tag for users, who can add posters, photos and links to reviews, building up a media-rich “gigography.” Eventually, Mr. Hogarth said, the company could sell memorabilia or live recordings through the archive. (So far the site does not have advertising.)

“There’s a need for a consumer brand that represents live music fans online,” Mr. Hogarth said. “Not focused on the venue or the particular ticketing system, but focused on the fan. And we believe that can be a huge company, similar to the way Yelp represents restaurants online, or Netflix represents movies online.”

He added: “If people are going to think of one brand when they think of live music, we’d like that to be us.”

Born in London, Mr. Hogarth studied artificial intelligence at Cambridge University and formed Songkick with two friends who, like him, were irritated by how difficult it could be to find concert information. Listings are scattered across the Internet, and ticketing companies’ impersonal e-mail blasts didn’t help much. After developing the basic idea for Songkick, Mr. Hogarth and his founding partners, Michelle You and Pete Smith, had a quick rise: the company received seed money and guidance from Y Combinator, an elite tech incubator in Boston. Among its investors are Index Ventures, whose media bets have included Skype and Last.fm.

But the company has already stepped on some industry toes. Songkick gets listings information from promoters and ticket services, but also has its computers trawl for it around the Web; last year Pollstar planted some dummy listings and saw them turn up on Songkick. Gary Bongiovanni, Pollstar’s editor, said his company had not taken action, but noted that in 2000 it sued another service, Gigmania, for doing something similar, and won a default judgment.

“I have no respect for anyone who tries to build a business off of other people’s hard work,” Mr. Bongiovanni said. In response, Mr. Hogarth said that Songkick no longer used Pollstar’s data.

At the Handsome Furs concert, Mr. Hogarth kept his backpack on, and made sure to stay through the encore. To stay fan-focused, Mr. Hogarth said, the company forbids its 20 employees from accepting free tickets. Instead, each employee gets a monthly gig allowance of about $40.

“As soon as we are on the list, the guest of the promoter, we’ll forget about the pain of not getting your ticket at 9 a.m. when the on-sale starts,” Mr. Hogarth said. “We’ll lose sight of what it means to be a fan.”

Songkick Site Tracks Live Music for Users - NYTimes.com

Wednesday
May042011

Reading Levels in Google's Sidebar

Reading Levels in Google's Sidebar

Google's search options sidebar includes a feature that was only available in the advanced search page: filtering results by reading level. If you enable this feature, Google will classify search results based on the complexity of the text. You can restrict the results to "basic" pages, "intermediate" pages and "advanced" pages, which are mostly scholarly articles.
"Sometimes you may want to limit your search results to a specific reading level. For instance, a junior high school teacher looking for content for her students or a second-language learner might want web pages written at a basic reading level. A scientist searching for the latest findings from the experts may want to limit results to those at advanced reading levels," explains Google.

Related Links by Google

Reading Levels in Google's Sidebar

Monday
May022011

Tracking Changes in Word

Turn Track Changes off or on, or hide or reveal tracked changes

 

To turn Track Changes off, on the Review tab, in the Tracking group, click the Track Changes button (the paper & pencil with the healthy orange glow, pictured below). Here's the relevant piece of Word real estate:

Tracking group on ribbon in Word

If your document contains tracked changes, like this:

Example of tracked changes in text

and you want to get rid of them, on the Review tab, in the Changes group, you can Accept or Reject each change or All Changes in Document:

Accept change button on ribbon in Word

Tracked changes can be hidden, which might or might not be a good thing. Either way, take a moment to become familiar with the Display for Review drop-down list and its four options:

Display for Review drop-down list on ribbon

Final: Show Markup shows all tracked changes.
Final hides tracked changes to show the document with all proposed changes included.
Original: Show Markup shows the original text with tracked changes and comments.
Original shows the document before any changes were made.

If your Track Changes needs are more sophisticated than the above, choose from this list of the Top 5 Track Changes-related videos, articles, and training courses on Office.com/support:

Bonus track (changes):

Remove tracked changes and comments from a document shows how to ensure that track changes and comments are not left in your Word 2007 documents when you distribute them.

Microsoft Word - Turn Track Changes off or on, or hide or reveal tracked changes

Friday
Apr292011

Google's AROUND proximity searches

http://batesinfo.com/Writing/Archive/Archive/april2011.html

I recently started playing around with one of Google's lesser-known features, the AROUND proximity operator. Google's AROUND syntax lets you specify how close you want two terms to appear in a web site. This can be particularly useful if you are looking for two topics that may often appear on the same page but not in relation to each other.

Your search choices are usually either to look for web pages that contain both words anywhere on the page or to restrict the search to pages in which the two words are adjacent. Now you can also specify that two words or phrases must be no more than, say, 5 words apart. The syntax is search-word AROUND(x) search-word, replacing "x" with the maximum number of words you want between the two search terms or phrases. (Be sure you type AROUND in all caps; otherwise, Google treats it as just another search term.)

How does this work in real life? I was recently working on a project analyzing the impact on the workplace of the arrival of digital natives (those who have grown up with digital technology). A search for "digital natives" workplace turned up useful information, but I had to wade through a fair amount of irrelevant material in which the phrase digital natives and the word workplace both appeared, but not in the appropriate context. When I changed my search to "digital natives" AROUND(6) workplace, the results were more focused on what I had in mind. The difference wasn't dramatic but the results were definitely better.

For straightforward, just-get-me-the-answer searches, the AROUND feature probably will not improve your search results noticeably. The query ipad review returns roughly the same number of useful results as the query ipad AROUND(4) review, for example. Since Google factors in the proximity of search terms in calculating the relevance of each page, most of the top results will naturally have your search terms relatively close to each other. The value of AROUND emerges when you are looking for the intersection of two concepts that do not frequently appear near each other.

Bates InfoTip Newsletter